What Happens After IPOS Objects to a Trade Mark Application?
Receiving an examination report from the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore does not necessarily mean that your trade mark application has been rejected.
An IPOS trade mark objection means that, during examination, IPOS has identified one or more issues that prevent the application from proceeding in its current form. The examination report will explain the grounds of objection and identify the goods or services affected.
An applicant generally has four months to respond. Depending on the objection, the applicant may submit legal arguments, provide evidence, amend or restrict the application, obtain consent from an earlier rights holder, or request a hearing before the Registrar. IPOS also provides procedures for requesting additional time in appropriate circumstances.
Ignoring an examination report can have serious consequences. Where the application was filed on or after 26 May 2022, the entire application may be treated as withdrawn if all claimed goods and services are objected to. If only some goods or services are affected, those parts may be treated as withdrawn while the remaining acceptable goods or services proceed.
Key Takeaways :
- An IPOS examination report is an objection raised during examination, not necessarily a final refusal.
- Applicants generally have four months to respond.
- Responses may include written legal submissions, supporting evidence, amendments, limitations or consent from an earlier rights holder.
- Form CM5 may be used to request an extension of time for responding to an objection.
- Form TM27 may be used for certain amendments to the application.
- An applicant may request an ex parte hearing using Form HC4.
- Missing the deadline may cause all or part of the application to be treated as withdrawn.
- A limited continued processing procedure may be available for another two months using Form CM13.
What Is an IPOS Trade Mark Objection?
After a trade mark application is filed in Singapore, IPOS examines whether it satisfies the requirements for registration.
Under section 12 of the Trade Marks Act 1998, the Registrar examines the application and may search earlier trade marks. If the requirements for registration are not met, or additional evidence or information is required, the applicant must be given an opportunity to respond, amend the application or provide the necessary material.
IPOS refers to this communication as an examination report.
The examination report normally identifies:
- The reason for the objection
- The relevant legal grounds
- Any earlier trade marks cited
- The goods or services affected
- Any problems with the specification
- The deadline for responding
- What action may be taken to address the objection
An objection therefore does not automatically end the application.
It indicates that something must be resolved before the mark can proceed towards publication and registration.
An IPOS Objection Is Different From a Trade Mark Opposition
It is important to distinguish a trade mark objection from a trade mark opposition.
Issue | IPOS objection | Trade mark opposition |
Who raises it? | IPOS examiner | Third party |
When does it occur? | During examination | After the application is accepted and published |
Main purpose | Determines whether registration requirements are satisfied | Allows another party to challenge the proposed registration |
Typical response | Arguments, evidence, amendments or hearing | Formal opposition proceedings |
Relevant stage | Examination | Publication |
IPOS states that accepted applications are published in the Trade Marks Journal for two months, during which interested parties may oppose registration. This happens after the examination stage has been successfully completed.
For example, if an IPOS examiner considers a mark too descriptive, that is an objection.
If a competitor later argues that the mark conflicts with its earlier rights after publication, that is an opposition.
The procedures and deadlines are different.
How to Read an IPOS Examination Report
The first step after receiving an examination report should be to determine exactly what IPOS is objecting to.
Do not assume that the entire application has failed.
Â
1. Check the legal grounds
Identify which provisions or examination requirements have been cited.
This usually helps establish whether the problem concerns:
- The nature of the mark itself
- An earlier trade mark
- The goods or services
- The application details
- Supporting evidence
- A procedural requirement
Â
2. Check which classes are affected
A multi class application may contain objections affecting only some goods or services.
For example, a business may file in Classes 9, 35 and 42. An objection could concern only particular services in Class 35.
That distinction matters because Singapore law allows acceptable goods or services to continue even where other parts of an application remain objectionable.
Â
3. Identify every cited earlier mark
If the objection concerns an earlier trade mark, review:
- The earlier mark itself
- Its application or registration date
- Its owner
- The goods and services covered
- The similarity between the marks
- The similarity between the respective goods and services
A proper response normally requires more than arguing that the marks are “different”.
Â
4. Record the response deadline immediately
IPOS currently requires an applicant to respond to an examination report within four months, subject to available extension procedures.
The deadline should be recorded as soon as the report is received.
Common Reasons IPOS May Object to a Trade Mark
Trade mark objections can arise for several reasons.
1. The mark lacks distinctiveness
A trade mark should be capable of distinguishing one trader’s goods or services from those of another.
Section 7 of the Trade Marks Act includes absolute grounds for refusing marks that lack distinctive character.
For example, a very ordinary expression that consumers would simply understand as describing the product may not function effectively as a badge of commercial origin.
2. The mark is descriptive
A trade mark may encounter difficulty where it consists exclusively of wording that describes characteristics such as:
- Type
- Quality
- Quantity
- Intended purpose
- Value
- Geographic origin
- Characteristics of the goods or services
These are among the absolute grounds addressed under section 7 of the Trade Marks Act.
For example, an application for wording equivalent to PREMIUM ACCOUNTING SERVICES for accounting services may encounter distinctiveness or descriptiveness concerns.
The precise outcome would depend on the mark and the particular goods or services claimed.
3. The wording is customary in the relevant trade
Terms that have become normal or customary expressions within an industry may also face registration difficulties.
This prevents individual businesses from obtaining inappropriate exclusivity over language that competitors ordinarily need to use.
4. The mark may deceive the public or breach other restrictions
Section 7 also addresses marks that may be contrary to public policy or morality, deceptive, prohibited by law or affected by other statutory restrictions.
5. An earlier trade mark has been identified
IPOS may cite an earlier trade mark where the application conflicts with earlier rights under the relative grounds for refusal.
Relevant issues can include:
- Similarity between the marks
- Similarity between the goods or services
- The distinctive elements of the earlier mark
- The likelihood of confusion where applicable
- Whether an earlier mark qualifies for protection as a well known mark
The relative grounds for refusal are principally addressed under section 8 of the Trade Marks Act.
6. The specification of goods or services is unclear
Problems may also arise from the way the goods or services are described.
IPOS maintains a Classification Database containing pre approved descriptions and expressly encourages applicants to use it to reduce classification objections and processing delays.
Examples of specification problems may include:
- Wording that is too vague
- Goods placed in the wrong class
- Services that cannot be clearly identified
- Descriptions requiring clarification
How Long Do You Have to Respond to an IPOS Objection?
For a Singapore national trade mark application, the standard response period stated by IPOS is four months from the examination report.
This does not mean applicants should wait until the fourth month before taking action.
A proper response may require time to:
- Review cited marks
- Analyse legal objections
- Search the register
- Contact an earlier rights holder
- Collect historical evidence
- Prepare a statutory declaration
- Revise specifications
- Obtain internal approvals
Â
Where an extension is required, IPOS states that Form CM5 should be filed by the existing response deadline. The first request currently attracts a S$25 fee, the second S$50, and the third and subsequent requests S$75. Third and subsequent requests must also be supported by reasons and remain subject to the Registry’s approval.
Fees and procedures can change, so they should always be checked with IPOS when filing.
Option 1: Submit Written Representations
One of the most common ways to respond to an IPOS trade mark objection is through written representations.
IPOS expressly allows applicants to make representations in writing in response to an examination report.
The appropriate arguments depend on the objection.
For a distinctiveness objection
The applicant may address:
- How consumers are likely to perceive the mark
- Whether the wording has an unusual meaning or structure
- Whether the mark merely alludes to the goods rather than directly describing them
- Whether the mark as a whole has distinctive features
Â
For an earlier mark citation
The response may consider:
- Visual similarity
- Aural similarity
- Conceptual similarity
- Distinctive components
- Differences between the goods or services
- The relevant consumers
- The circumstances in which the goods or services are purchased
Â
Each objection in the examination report should generally be addressed specifically rather than responding with a broad statement that the application should be accepted.
Option 2: Provide Evidence
Some objections may be addressed partly through evidence.
IPOS specifically recognises statutory declarations for evidence of distinctiveness acquired through use and evidence relating to honest concurrent use.
Potential evidence may include:
- The period during which the mark has been used
- Sales figures
- Revenue attributable to branded goods or services
- Advertising expenditure
- Marketing campaigns
- Product packaging
- Media coverage
- Trade publications
- Website traffic
- Customer exposure
- Market share information
- Evidence showing recognition of the mark
The relevance and strength of the evidence will depend on the specific objection.
Simply submitting a large collection of marketing materials may not be enough. The evidence should address the legal issue identified by IPOS.
Option 3: Amend or Restrict the Application
Sometimes the most commercially sensible response is not to argue against every part of the objection.
Instead, an applicant may consider narrowing the application.
IPOS identifies Form TM27 for certain amendments to a pending trade mark application.
Possible amendments can include changes to:
- Specifications of goods or services
- Class numbers
- Certain application details
- Limitations permitted under the applicable rules
However, amendments are subject to important restrictions.
IPOS states that an amendment cannot substantially alter the identity of the mark, and amendments to the specification cannot expand the scope of protection sought.
For example, an applicant may be able to narrow:
Business consultancy; business management; retail services; advertising
to a more specific group of commercially relevant services where doing so resolves a conflict.
The applicant generally cannot use the amendment process to transform the existing application into a materially broader application.
Option 4: Obtain Consent or Address an Earlier Trade Mark
Where IPOS has cited an earlier mark, another possible strategy is to approach its owner.
IPOS expressly recognises a letter of consent as a possible means of overcoming certain earlier mark citations.
The earlier proprietor may agree to:
- Consent to registration
- Consent to particular goods or services
- Enter into a coexistence arrangement
- Agree on market positioning
- Agree to certain restrictions
An applicant might also amend the specification to reduce overlap with the earlier registration.
However, consent should not be treated as an automatic solution to every objection. Whether it resolves the particular examination issue depends on the legal basis of the objection and the terms of the consent.
The commercial implications of a coexistence agreement should also be considered carefully, particularly where both businesses may expand in the future.
Option 5: Request a Hearing
If the applicant disagrees with the examiner and the objection cannot be resolved through correspondence, the applicant may request a hearing before the Registrar.
IPOS identifies Form HC4 for requesting a hearing at which only the applicant is present, commonly referred to as an ex parte hearing. The current filing fee listed by IPOS is S$100 per trade mark number.
A hearing may be appropriate where:
- Significant legal arguments remain unresolved
- The applicant disputes the examiner’s interpretation
- Written responses have not overcome the objection
- The application has substantial commercial importance
- The applicant seeks a formal determination
Â
The hearing allows the applicant to present its legal arguments before a decision is made.
Depending on the eventual decision and applicable procedural requirements, further review or appeal options may also be available. IPOS maintains records of ex parte trade mark decisions and appeals arising from such proceedings.
What Happens If You Miss the Four Month Deadline?
Missing an examination report deadline should be treated seriously.
For applications filed on or after 26 May 2022, if all goods or services are objected to and there is no timely response, the entire application is treated as withdrawn. If only part of the specification is objectionable, only those goods or services are treated as withdrawn while the acceptable portions may proceed.
However, IPOS provides a limited continued processing procedure.
Where the application or affected goods and services are shown as “Treated as Withdrawn (Continued Processing Possible)”, the applicant has another two months to request continued processing using Form CM13. The request must be accompanied by the outstanding response to the examination report.
The current fee for Form CM13 is S$100.
Important: Do not assume that every missed deadline can be restored. Continued processing is subject to the applicable legislation, procedure and time limits. Once the additional period expires, the relevant application or goods and services may no longer be able to proceed.
What Can Happen After You Respond?
There are several possible outcomes after an applicant submits a response.
The objection may be withdrawn: If the examiner accepts the arguments, evidence or amendments, the application may proceed.
The application may be accepted only for some goods or services: An objection affecting part of the specification does not necessarily prevent the remaining acceptable goods or services from continuing. Singapore’s current examination framework allows partial acceptance where the registration requirements have been satisfied for only some of the claimed goods or services.
IPOS may issue a further examination report: The examiner may consider that some issues remain unresolved and provide another opportunity to address them.
A hearing may be required: Where disagreement remains, the applicant may request an ex parte hearing through Form HC4.
The application may ultimately be refused: If the registration requirements remain unsatisfied after the available examination and hearing procedures, the application may not proceed for the affected goods or services.
The application may proceed to publication: If IPOS accepts the application, it will be published in the Trade Marks Journal for a two month opposition period. If no opposition is filed, or any opposition is resolved in the applicant’s favour, the application can proceed towards registration.
IPOS Objection Response Strategy
Type of objection | Possible response |
Descriptive mark | Legal submissions explaining why the mark is distinctive, together with evidence of acquired distinctiveness where appropriate |
Lack of distinctive character | Written arguments, evidence of use, or reconsideration of the filing strategy |
Similar earlier trade mark | Comparison of the marks, comparison of goods and services, consent, honest concurrent use evidence or limitation of the specification |
Goods and services specification | Clarification, narrowing or permitted amendment using the appropriate IPOS procedure |
Classification problem | Correct or clarify the class or specification |
Evidence requirement | Statutory declaration or other supporting material |
Objection remains unresolved | Consider an ex parte hearing through Form HC4 |
Practical Steps After Receiving an IPOS Examination Report
When an examination report arrives, a structured approach can help prevent unnecessary delay.
- Record the response deadline immediately.
- Identify every objection raised.
- Confirm which classes and goods or services are affected.
- Review any earlier marks cited by IPOS.
- Assess whether legal submissions alone are sufficient.
- Determine whether evidence of use is required.
- Consider whether narrowing the specification would resolve the issue.
- Consider approaching an earlier rights holder where consent is relevant.
- Request an extension before the deadline where additional time is genuinely required.
- Consider a hearing where material objections remain unresolved.
Â
The strongest strategy is not necessarily to contest every objection.
In some cases, a carefully drafted limitation may achieve commercially useful protection more efficiently than a prolonged dispute over goods or services that the applicant does not genuinely require.
Frequently Asked Questions About IPOS Trade Mark Objections
Yes, many objections can potentially be resolved depending on their nature. IPOS allows applicants to submit written representations, information or evidence, make permitted amendments and request a hearing.
The strength of the response depends on the mark, legal grounds and supporting evidence.
IPOS currently provides four months to respond to an examination report for a Singapore trade mark application.
Yes. IPOS states that Form CM5 may be used to request an extension relating to a deficiency or objection letter. The extension request should be filed before the existing response deadline.
Certain amendments may be made using Form TM27. However, an amendment cannot expand the scope of the goods or services claimed, and changes to the mark itself cannot substantially alter its identity.
Depending on whether the objection affects all or only some of the application, the whole application or the affected goods and services may be treated as withdrawn. A limited two month continued processing period may then be available through Form CM13.
A hearing can be requested before the Registrar where an examination objection remains unresolved, and Singapore’s trade mark framework provides further review and appeal mechanisms for Registrar decisions subject to the relevant procedural requirements. Because appeal deadlines and requirements are procedural matters with significant consequences, specific advice should be obtained promptly after a refusal or hearing decision.
Speak to an Intellectual Property Lawyer in Singapore
An IPOS trade mark objection does not automatically mean the end of your application.
It means that IPOS considers that one or more registration requirements have not yet been satisfied.
Depending on the circumstances, an applicant may overcome the objection through:
- Written legal arguments
- Evidence of use or acquired distinctiveness
- Amendments to the goods or services
- Consent from an earlier trade mark owner
- Honest concurrent use evidence
- An ex parte hearing
Â
The most important step is to understand the objection early and respond within the applicable deadline.
Leaving an examination report unanswered may result in all or part of the application being treated as withdrawn. Although continued processing may sometimes provide an additional opportunity, it should not be relied upon as a substitute for responding within the original four month period.
Â
Received an IPOS Trade Mark Examination Report?
An objection can sometimes be resolved through a targeted legal response rather than abandoning the application.
Netto & Magin LLC can assist with reviewing IPOS examination reports, preparing responses, addressing earlier trade mark citations, amending specifications and advising on hearing options.
Arrange an assessment before the applicable response deadline expires.
Â
Legal Disclaimer
This article provides general information on Singapore trade mark law and does not constitute legal advice. The appropriate response to an IPOS examination report depends on the particular application, objection and surrounding circumstances.
Netto & Magin LLC
Netto & Magin LLC is a boutique law firm in Singapore, boasting over 50 years of proven experience. Our specialized expertise covers Family Law, Corporate Law, Employment Law, Fraud Cases, and Commercial and Civil Litigation. With a dedicated team of industry-leading experts located strategically in Singapore's central business district, we stand ready to serve as your trusted legal partner.
Contact us for a free consultation.
